ConcatvsvLLM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | vLLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 95 785 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +3 233 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
vLLM scores 91/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; vLLM needs more configuration.
Concat details →vLLM details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep vLLM, compare it with