ConcatvsUnison
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Unison | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 12 510 | 5 559 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Unison, so it is the safer default.
Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Unison needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 511 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Unison details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Unison, compare it with