ConcatvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 409 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 410 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 410 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with