ConcatvsRadarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Radarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 409 | 14 670 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 410 | +246 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Radarr, so it is the safer default.
Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 410 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Radarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Radarr, compare it with