ConcatvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 12 397 | 61 536 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 398 | +492 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 398 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with