ConcatvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 12 498 | 28 969 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 499 | +456 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 499 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with