Concatvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 393 292 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +2 944 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 37 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
Concat details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with