ConcatvsMediaMTX
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | MediaMTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 12 478 | 20 539 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 479 | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 79/100 for MediaMTX, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 479 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →MediaMTX details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with