Concatvskoodo-reader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | koodo-reader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 434 | 28 657 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 435 | +375 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 78/100 for koodo-reader, so it is the safer default.
koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 435 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →koodo-reader details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with