Companion SpacevsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Companion Space | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #80 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 338 | 264 906 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 914 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 42/100 for Companion Space, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Companion Space needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).
Companion Space details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep Companion Space, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with