Coddy Agentvsphenixcode
Two self-hosted AI Assistant projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coddy Agent | phenixcode | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant | #100 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 189 | 21 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.3.67 · 30 Oct 2026 | v2.4.2 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Coddy Agent scores 50/100 against 36/100 for phenixcode, so it is the safer default.
Coddy Agent ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for phenixcode.
If you want the quickest setup, Coddy Agent is easier to run; phenixcode needs more configuration.
Coddy Agent is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
Coddy Agent details →phenixcode details →All AI Assistant projects →
Swap a project
Keep Coddy Agent, compare it with
Keep phenixcode, compare it with