CloakBrowservsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 32 584 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +226 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+226 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with