ClipForgevsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ClipForge | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 119 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.9.12 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 57/100 for ClipForge, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ClipForge.
If you want the quickest setup, ClipForge is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
ClipForge details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep ClipForge, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with