ClipForgevscobalt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ClipForge | cobalt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 117 | 45 591 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 807 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.12 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Svelte |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 57/100 for ClipForge, so it is the safer default.
ClipForge ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; ClipForge needs more configuration.
cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 807 stars in 30 days).
ClipForge details →cobalt details →
Swap a project
Keep ClipForge, compare it with
Keep cobalt, compare it with