ChronoFramevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with