chatwootvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 38 531 | 16 064 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 370 | +241 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 31 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |
Which one should you pick?
chatwoot scores 84/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 370 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →