AnswervsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Answer | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 | 118 088 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +5 729 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.0.3 · 22 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 71/100 for Answer, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Answer.
If you want the quickest setup, Answer is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 729 stars in 30 days).
Answer details →TradingAgents details →