chatwootvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 38 512 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 390 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 76 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
chatwoot scores 84/100 against 77/100 for ToolJet, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 390 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →ToolJet details →