chatwootvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 501 | 156 109 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 379 | +918 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 20 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
chatwoot details →langflow details →