ChatGPT Web Midjourney ProxyvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in AI Chat | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 801 | 264 716 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 724 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.26.8 · 29 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 63/100 for ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy, so it is the safer default.
ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Web Midjourney Proxy, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with