ChatGPT Next WebvsPlayerr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Next Web | Playerr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #17 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 88 911 | 180 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.
Playerr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ChatGPT Next Web.
If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; Playerr needs more configuration.
ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Next Web details →Playerr details →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Next Web, compare it with
Keep Playerr, compare it with