ChartDBvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with