supabasevsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Traffic Source is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with