ChartDBvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 23 026 | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +1 772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB and RustFS score the same (74/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with