ChartDBvsGreenmask
Two self-hosted Database Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Greenmask | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #28 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 026 | 1 798 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v0.2.26 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 57/100 for Greenmask, so it is the safer default.
Greenmask ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Greenmask needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Greenmask details →All Database Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Greenmask, compare it with