Greenmaskvssupabase
Two self-hosted Database Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Greenmask | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 798 | 114 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.2.26 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 57/100 for Greenmask, so it is the safer default.
Greenmask ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Greenmask is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).
Greenmask details →supabase details →All Database Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep Greenmask, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with