cftunnelvsWireGuard Easy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cftunnel | WireGuard Easy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 360 | 27 317 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +329 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.4.4 · 26 Sept 2026 | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
WireGuard Easy scores 73/100 against 51/100 for cftunnel, so it is the safer default.
cftunnel ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.
WireGuard Easy is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).
cftunnel details →WireGuard Easy details →
Swap a project
Keep cftunnel, compare it with
Keep WireGuard Easy, compare it with