cephvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ceph | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 177 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ceph scores 78/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.
ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
ceph details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep ceph, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with