Apache CassandravsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra details →OpenReader details →