cephvsMularr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ceph | Mularr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 17 179 | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ceph scores 78/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.
Mularr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.
If you want the quickest setup, Mularr is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.
ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
ceph details →Mularr details →
Swap a project
Keep ceph, compare it with
Keep Mularr, compare it with