CasaOSvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CasaOS | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in Home Server | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 37 390 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
CasaOS scores 76/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CasaOS.
If you want the quickest setup, CasaOS is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
CasaOS details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep CasaOS, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with