docker-pi-holevswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with