capjsvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| capjs | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 78 in Security | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 8 203 | 24 054 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +351 | +776 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | standalone@3.1.13 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 72/100 for capjs, so it is the safer default.
capjs ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, capjs is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).
capjs details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep capjs, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with