camofox-browservsZulip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Zulip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 12 033 | 26 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 6 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | 12.3 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zulip scores 82/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Zulip.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Zulip needs more configuration.
camofox-browser details →Zulip details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Zulip, compare it with