camofox-browservsskyvern
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | skyvern | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #3 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 030 | 23 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +237 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 26 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser and skyvern score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; skyvern needs more configuration.
camofox-browser details →skyvern details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep skyvern, compare it with