camofox-browservsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 039 | 15 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +282 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.
Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+282 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Zigbee2MQTT details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Zigbee2MQTT, compare it with