camofox-browservsyoutube-dl-nas
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | youtube-dl-nas | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.
youtube-dl-nas ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; youtube-dl-nas needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →youtube-dl-nas details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl-nas, compare it with