camofox-browservswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 12 033 | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | +161 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
camofox-browser details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with