camofox-browservsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with