camofox-browservsweb-portal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | web-portal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #23 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 12 048 | 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +291 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 48/100 for web-portal, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for web-portal.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; web-portal needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →web-portal details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep web-portal, compare it with