camofox-browservsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with