camofox-browservsVirtual Radar Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Virtual Radar Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 12 044 | 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 49/100 for Virtual Radar Server, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Virtual Radar Server.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Virtual Radar Server needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Virtual Radar Server details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Virtual Radar Server, compare it with