camofox-browservsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with