CloakBrowservsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 32 568 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +210 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+210 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with