camofox-browservsUniFi Docker Container
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | UniFi Docker Container | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | 10.6.106 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 53/100 for UniFi Docker Container, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; UniFi Docker Container needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →UniFi Docker Container details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep UniFi Docker Container, compare it with