CloakBrowservsUniFi Docker Container
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | UniFi Docker Container | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 586 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +228 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | 10.6.106 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 53/100 for UniFi Docker Container, so it is the safer default.
UniFi Docker Container ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+228 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →UniFi Docker Container details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep UniFi Docker Container, compare it with