camofox-browservsTurtl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Turtl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 12 048 | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +291 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Turtl needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Turtl details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Turtl, compare it with