camofox-browservsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 12 024 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +267 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with