camofox-browservsfigranium
Two self-hosted Browser Automation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | figranium | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 11 in Browser Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 025 | 778 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +268 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for figranium, so it is the safer default.
figranium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; figranium needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+268 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →figranium details →All Browser Automation projects →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep figranium, compare it with