Lightpandavsfigranium
Two self-hosted Browser Automation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lightpanda | figranium | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 11 in Browser Automation |
| GitHub stars | 37 085 | 778 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 21 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Zig | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 52/100 for figranium, so it is the safer default.
figranium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Lightpanda.
If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; figranium needs more configuration.
Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
Lightpanda details →figranium details →All Browser Automation projects →
Swap a project
Keep Lightpanda, compare it with
Keep figranium, compare it with